Persuasive Precedents

Bex, F., Bench-Capon, T.B.C., & Verheij, B. (2012). Persuasive Precedents. The Third Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative (CMN 2012), 169 -173. http://narrative.csail.mit.edu/ws12/proceedings.pdf. details pdf

Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes

Bex, F.J., & Verheij, B. (2012). Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes. Argumentation 26 (3), 325-353. details pdf

Jumping to Conclusions. A Logico-Probabilistic Foundation for Defeasible Rule-Based Arguments

Verheij, B. (2012). Jumping to Conclusions. A Logico-Probabilistic Foundation for Defeasible Rule-Based Arguments. 13th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, JELIA 2012. Toulouse, France, September 2012. Proceedings (LNAI 7519) (eds. Fariñas del Cerro, L., Herzig, A., & Mengin, J.), 411-423. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. details pdf

Legal Shifts in the Process of Proof

Bex, F.J., & Verheij, B. (2011). Legal Shifts in the Process of Proof. The 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2011). Proceedings of the Conference, 11-20. New York (New York): ACM.

details about this publication

Het onderbouwen van een feitelijk oordeel in een strafzaak

Bex, F.J., & Verheij, B. (2010). Het Onderbouwen van een Feitelijk Oordeel in een Strafzaak. Reizen met mijn Rechter. Psychologie van het Recht (eds. P.J. Van Koppen, H. Merckelbach, M. Jelicic & J.W. De Keijser), 935-952. Deventer: Kluwer.

details about this publication

Arguments, Stories and Evidence: Critical Questions for Fact-Finding

Bex, F.J., & Verheij, B. (2011). Arguments, Stories and Evidence: Critical Questions for Fact-Finding. Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2010). Amsterdam: SicSat.

details about this publication

A Hybrid Formal Theory of Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence

Bex, F.J., van Koppen, P.J., Prakken, H., & Verheij, B. (2010). A Hybrid Formal Theory of Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence. Artificial Intelligence and Law: 18 (2), 123-152.

details about this publication

Story Schemes for Argumentation about the Facts of a Crime

Bex, F.J., & Verheij, B. (2010). Story Schemes for Argumentation about the Facts of a Crime. Computational Models of Narrative: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium (FS-10-04) (eds. Finlayson, M., Gervás, P., Mueller, E., Narayanan, S., & Winston, P.H.), 6-13. Menlo Park (California): AAAI Press. http://www.aaai.org/Press/Reports/Symposia/Fall/fs-10-04.php.

details about this publication

Accepting the Truth of a Story about the Facts of a Criminal Case.

Verheij, B., & Bex, F.J. (2009). Accepting the Truth of a Story About the Facts of a Criminal Case. Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic (Applied Legal Philosophy Series) (eds. H. Kaptein, H. Prakken & B. Verheij), 161-193. Farnham: Ashgate.

details about this publication

Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic (Applied Legal Philosophy series).

Kaptein, H.,  Prakken, H.,  & Verheij, B.  (eds.).  (2009). Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic (Applied Legal Philosophy Series). Farnham: Ashgate.

details about this publication

General Introduction.

Kaptein, H.,  Prakken, H.,  & Verheij, B.  (2009). General Introduction. Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic (Applied Legal Philosophy Series) (eds. Kaptein, H., Prakken, H., & Verheij, B.), 1-14. Farnham: Ashgate.

details about this publication

Sense-Making Software for Crime Investigation: How to Combine Stories and Arguments?

Bex, F.J., Van den Braak, S.W., Van Oostendorp, H., Prakken, H., Verheij, B., & Vreeswijk, G. (2007). Sense-Making Software for Crime Investigation: How to Combine Stories and Arguments? Proceedings of the 19th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (eds. M.M. Dastani & E. de Jong), pp. 311-312.

details about this publication

Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments?

Bex, F.J., Van den Braak, S.W., Van Oostendorp, H., Prakken, H., Verheij, B., & Vreeswijk, G. (2007). Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? Law, Probability & Risk: 6, 145-168.

details about this publication

Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence.

Bex, F.J., Prakken, H., & Verheij, B. (2007). Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. The 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Proceedings of the Conference, 1-10.
New York (New York): ACM.

details about this publication

Anchored narratives in reasoning about evidence.

Bex, F.J., Prakken, H., & Verheij, B. (2006). Anchored narratives in reasoning about evidence. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference (ed. van Engers, T.), 11-20.
Amsterdam: IOS Press.

details about this publication

Anchored narratives and dialectical argumentation.

Verheij, B. (2001). Anchored narratives and dialectical argumentation. ICAIL-2001 Workshop on AI and Legal Evidence.

details about this publication

Dialectical Argumentation as a Heuristic for Courtroom Decision Making.

Verheij, B. (2000). Dialectical Argumentation as a Heuristic for Courtroom Decision Making. Rationality, Information and Progress in Law and Psychology. Liber Amicorum Hans F. Crombag (eds. van Koppen, P.J., & Roos, N.), 203-226.
Maastricht: Metajuridica Publications. Argentine.Lankkamp@metajur.unimaas.nl.

details about this publication