Bench-Capon, T., Araszkiewicz, M., Ashley, K., Atkinson, K., Bex, F., Borges, F., Bourcier, D., Bourgine, D., Conrad, J.G., Francesconi, E., Gordon, T.F., Governatori, G., Leidner, J.L., Lewis, D.D., Loui, R.P., McCarty, L.T., Prakken, H., Schilder, F., Schweighofer, E., Thompson, P., Tyrrell, A., Verheij, B., Walton, D.N., & Wyner, A.Z. (2012). A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9131-x. details
Posts Tagged ‘rules’
A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law
January 1, 2012What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents
January 1, 2012Bex, F.J., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., & Verheij, B. (2012). What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents. Jusletter IT, Die Zeitschrift für IT und Recht . http://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/magnoliaPublic/issues/2012/12-09-2012/2038.html. Reprint of Bex, F.J., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., & Verheij, B. (2011). What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2011: The Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference (ed. Atkinson, K.M.), 23-32. Amsterdam: IOS Press. details pdf
What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents
January 1, 2011Bex, F.J., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., & Verheij, B. (2011). What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2011: The Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference (ed. K.M. Atkinson), 23-32. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Argumentation and Rules with Exceptions
January 1, 2010Verheij, B. (2010). Argumentation and Rules with Exceptions. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2010. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 216 (eds. Baroni, P., Cerutti, F., Giacomin, M., & Simari, G.R.), 455-462. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
About the Logical Relations between Cases and Rules.
January 1, 2008Verheij, B. (2008). About the Logical Relations between Cases and Rules. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference (eds. Francesconi, E., Sartor, G., & Tiscornia, D.), 21-32. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Over de logische samenhang tussen casus en regels.
January 1, 2007Verheij, B. (2007). Over de logische samenhang tussen casus en regels. ‘Alles afwegende….’ Bijdragen aan het Vijfde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie. Rotterdam 22 juni 2007 (eds. Feteris, E.T., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H.J., & Pontier, J.A.), 331-338.
Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.
Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme.
January 1, 2006Verheij, B. (2006). Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme. Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (eds. Hitchcock, D.L., & Verheij, B.), 181-202.
Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme.
January 1, 2005Verheij, B. (2005). Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme. Argumentation: 19 (3), 347-371.
Virtual arguments. On the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers.
January 1, 2005Verheij, B. (2005). Virtual arguments. On the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme.
January 1, 2001Verheij, B. (2001). Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme. Argumentation and its Applications. Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA 2001) (eds. Hansen, H.V., Tindale, C.W., Blair, J.A., & Johnson, R.H.).
Oplossing van casusposities over onrechtmatige daad met moderne logische hulpmiddelen.
January 1, 2000Verheij, B. (2000). Oplossing van casusposities over onrechtmatige daad met moderne logische hulpmiddelen. Met recht en reden. Bijdragen aan het Derde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie, 18 juni 1999 te Rotterdam (eds. Feteris, E.T., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H.J., & Pontier, J.A.), 221-230.
Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.
Book review: Formalism and interpretation in the logic of law (Review of H. Prakken’s ‘Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument’).
January 1, 2000Verheij, B. (2000). Book review: Formalism and interpretation in the logic of law (Review of H. Prakken’s ‘Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument’). Artificial Intelligence and Law: 8, 35-65.
De logica van de onrechtmatige daad.
January 1, 1999Verheij, B., Hage, J.C., & van Maanen, G.E. (1999). De logica van de onrechtmatige daad. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Burgerlijk Recht: 16 (4), 95-102.
An integrated view on rules and principles.
January 1, 1998Verheij, B., Hage, J.C., & van den Herik, H.J. (1998). An integrated view on rules and principles. Artificial Intelligence and Law: 6 (1), 3-26.
Logical tools for legal argument: a practical assessment in the domain of tort.
January 1, 1997Verheij, B., Hage, J.C., & Lodder, A.R. (1997). Logical tools for legal argument: a practical assessment in the domain of tort. The Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Proceedings of the Conference, 243-249.
New York (New York): ACM.
An integrated view on rules and principles.
January 1, 1996Verheij, B. (1996). An integrated view on rules and principles. Legal Knowledge Based Systems. JURIX ’96. Foundations of Legal Knowledge Systems (eds. van Kralingen, R.W., van den Herik, H.J., Prins, J.E.J., Sergot, M., & Zeleznikow, J.), 25-38.
Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal studies of argumentation and defeat.
January 1, 1996Verheij, B. (1996). Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal studies of argumentation and defeat. Maastricht: Dissertation Universiteit Maastricht.
Reason Based Logic in Law.
January 1, 1995Verheij, B. (1995). Reason Based Logic in Law. Verso un sistema esperto giuridico integrale (eds. Ciampi, C., Natali, F.S., & Elmi, G. T.), 681-693.
Padova: CEDAM.
Rules and reasons: from ontology to rational standards for defeasible reasoning.
January 1, 1995Verheij, B. (1995). Rules and reasons: from ontology to rational standards for defeasible reasoning. Report SKBS/B3.A/95-07.
Towards a logic for reasoning with norms.
January 1, 1994Hage, J.C., & Verheij, B. (1994). Towards a logic for reasoning with norms. ECAI’94 Workshop W9, Artificial Normative Reasoning (ed. Breuker, J.A.), 160-177.
Reason Based Logic and legal knowledge representation.
January 1, 1994Verheij, B. (1994). Reason Based Logic and legal knowledge representation. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Law, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (eds. Carr, I., & Narayanan, A.), 154-165.
University of Exeter.
Reason-based Logic: a logic for reasoning with rules and reasons.
January 1, 1994Hage, J.C., & Verheij, B. (1994). Reason-based Logic: a logic for reasoning with rules and reasons. Law, Computers & Artificial Intelligence: 3 (2-3), 171-209.
Reasoning by analogy: a formal reconstruction.
January 1, 1994Verheij, B., & Hage, J.C. (1994). Reasoning by analogy: a formal reconstruction. Legal knowledge based systems. The relation with legal theory (eds. Prakken, H., Muntjewerff, A.J., & Soeteman, A.), 65-78.
Lelystad: Koninklijke Vermande.
