What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents

Bex, F.J., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., & Verheij, B. (2012). What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents. Jusletter IT, Die Zeitschrift für IT und Recht . http://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/magnoliaPublic/issues/2012/12-09-2012/2038.html. Reprint of Bex, F.J., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., & Verheij, B. (2011). What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2011: The Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference (ed. Atkinson, K.M.), 23-32. Amsterdam: IOS Press. details pdf

Jumping to Conclusions. A Logico-Probabilistic Foundation for Defeasible Rule-Based Arguments

Verheij, B. (2012). Jumping to Conclusions. A Logico-Probabilistic Foundation for Defeasible Rule-Based Arguments. 13th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, JELIA 2012. Toulouse, France, September 2012. Proceedings (LNAI 7519) (eds. Fariñas del Cerro, L., Herzig, A., & Mengin, J.), 411-423. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. details pdf

What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents

Bex, F.J., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., & Verheij, B. (2011). What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2011: The Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference (ed. K.M. Atkinson), 23-32. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

details about his publication

Legal Shifts in the Process of Proof

Bex, F.J., & Verheij, B. (2011). Legal Shifts in the Process of Proof. The 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2011). Proceedings of the Conference, 11-20. New York (New York): ACM.

details about this publication

Argumentation and Rules with Exceptions

Verheij, B. (2010). Argumentation and Rules with Exceptions. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2010. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 216 (eds. Baroni, P., Cerutti, F., Giacomin, M., & Simari, G.R.), 455-462. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

details about this publication

About the Logical Relations between Cases and Rules.

Verheij, B. (2008). About the Logical Relations between Cases and Rules. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference (eds. Francesconi, E., Sartor, G., & Tiscornia, D.), 21-32. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

details about this publication

Over de logische samenhang tussen casus en regels.

Verheij, B. (2007). Over de logische samenhang tussen casus en regels. ‘Alles afwegende….’ Bijdragen aan het Vijfde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie. Rotterdam 22 juni 2007 (eds. Feteris, E.T., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H.J., & Pontier, J.A.), 331-338.
Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.

details about this publication

Cases and dialectical arguments – An approach to case-based reasoning.

Roth, B., & Verheij, B. (2004). Cases and dialectical arguments – An approach to case-based reasoning. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: Otm 2004 Workshops, Proceedings, 634-651.

details about this publication

Dialectical arguments and case comparison.

Roth, B., & Verheij, B. (2004). Dialectical arguments and case comparison. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference (ed. Gordon, T.F.), 99-108.
Amsterdam: IOS Press.

details about this publication