Verheij, B. (2009). The Toulmin Argument Model in Artificial Intelligence. Or: How Semi-Formal, Defeasible Argumentation Schemes Creep into Logic. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence (eds. I. Rahwan & G. Simari), 219-238. Dordrecht: Springer.
Archive for January, 2009
The Toulmin Argument Model in Artificial Intelligence. Or: how semi-formal, defeasible argumentation schemes creep into logic.
January 1, 2009How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving? (Abstract).
January 1, 2009Colen, S., Cnossen, F., & Verheij, B. (2009). How Much Logical Structure Is Helpful in Content-Based Argumentation Software for Legal Case Solving? (Abstract). Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Cogsci 2009) (eds. N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn). http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2009/papers/213/.
A note on the semi-stable semantics of abstract argumentation systems
January 1, 2009Verheij, B. (2009). A note on the semi-stable semantics of abstract argumentation systems. Technical report.
How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving?
January 1, 2009Colen, S., Cnossen, F., & Verheij, B. (2009). How Much Logical Structure Is Helpful in Content-Based Argumentation Software for Legal Case Solving? The 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Proceedings of the Conference, 224-225. New York (New York): ACM.