Bex, F.J., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., & Verheij, B. (2011). What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2011: The Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference (ed. K.M. Atkinson), 23-32. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents
January 1, 2011Vaardig met Recht. Vaardigheden voor Juristen. Vierde Druk (Skilful in the Law. Skills for Lawyers. Fourth Edition)
January 1, 2011Hage, J.C., Verheij, B., & Fernhout, F. (2011). Vaardig met Recht. Vaardigheden voor Juristen. Vierde Druk (Skilful in the Law. Skills for Lawyers. Fourth Edition). The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers. http://www.vaardigmetrecht.nl/.
The Advantage of Higher-Order Theory of Mind in the Game of Limited Bidding
January 1, 2011de Weerd, H., & Verheij, B. (2011). The Advantage of Higher-Order Theory of Mind in the Game of Limited Bidding. Proceedings of the Workshop on Reasoning About Other Minds: Logical and Cognitive Perspectives (RAOM-2011), Groningen, The Netherlands, July 11th, 2011 (eds. van Eijck, J., & Verbrugge, L.C.), 149-164. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-751/.
Using software agents to investigate the interactive origins of communication systems
January 1, 2010de Bie, P., Scott-Phillips, T., Kirby, S., & Verheij, B. (2010). Using Software Agents to Investigate the Interactive Origins of Communication Systems. The Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference (Evolang8) (eds. A.D.M. Smith, M. Schouwstra, B. de Boer & K. Smith), 393-394. Singapore: World Scientific.
Argumentation and Rules with Exceptions
January 1, 2010Verheij, B. (2010). Argumentation and Rules with Exceptions. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2010. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 216 (eds. Baroni, P., Cerutti, F., Giacomin, M., & Simari, G.R.), 455-462. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
On the Existence of Semi-Stable Extensions
January 1, 2010Caminada, M.W.A., & Verheij, B. (2010). On the Existence of Semi-Stable Extensions. Proceedings of the 22nd Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2010). http://bnaic2010.uni.lu/proceedings.html.
The Toulmin Argument Model in Artificial Intelligence. Or: how semi-formal, defeasible argumentation schemes creep into logic.
January 1, 2009Verheij, B. (2009). The Toulmin Argument Model in Artificial Intelligence. Or: How Semi-Formal, Defeasible Argumentation Schemes Creep into Logic. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence (eds. I. Rahwan & G. Simari), 219-238. Dordrecht: Springer.
How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving? (Abstract).
January 1, 2009Colen, S., Cnossen, F., & Verheij, B. (2009). How Much Logical Structure Is Helpful in Content-Based Argumentation Software for Legal Case Solving? (Abstract). Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Cogsci 2009) (eds. N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn). http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2009/papers/213/.
A note on the semi-stable semantics of abstract argumentation systems
January 1, 2009Verheij, B. (2009). A note on the semi-stable semantics of abstract argumentation systems. Technical report.
How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving?
January 1, 2009Colen, S., Cnossen, F., & Verheij, B. (2009). How Much Logical Structure Is Helpful in Content-Based Argumentation Software for Legal Case Solving? The 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Proceedings of the Conference, 224-225. New York (New York): ACM.
About the Logical Relations between Cases and Rules.
January 1, 2008Verheij, B. (2008). About the Logical Relations between Cases and Rules. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference (eds. Francesconi, E., Sartor, G., & Tiscornia, D.), 21-32. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Vaardig met recht. Vaardigheden voor juristen. Derde druk (Skilful in the law. Skills for Lawyers. Third Edition).
January 1, 2008Hage, J.C., Verheij, B., & Fernhout, F. (2008). Vaardig met recht. Vaardigheden voor juristen. Derde druk (Skilful in the law. Skills for Lawyers. Third Edition). The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Beyond boxes and arrows: argumentation support in terms of the knowledge structure of a legal topic.
January 1, 2007Schweers, M., & Verheij, B. (2007). Beyond boxes and arrows: argumentation support in terms of the knowledge structure of a legal topic. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference (eds. Lodder, A.R., & Mommers, L.), 109-118.
Amsterdam: IOS Press.
A Labeling Approach to the Computation of Credulous Acceptance in Argumentation.
January 1, 2007Verheij, B. (2007). A Labeling Approach to the Computation of Credulous Acceptance in Argumentation. IJCAI 2007, Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Hyderabad, India, January 6-12, 2007 (ed. Veloso, M.M.), 623-628.
http://www.ijcai.org/proceedings07.php.
A Coffeehouse Conversation on the Van den Herik Test.
January 1, 2007Verheij, B. (2007). A Coffeehouse Conversation on the Van den Herik Test. Liber Amicorum ter gelegenheid van de 60e verjaardag van Prof.dr. H. Jaap van den Herik, 155-163.
Maastricht: Maastricht ICT Competence Center.
