Verheij, B. (2009). The Toulmin Argument Model in Artificial Intelligence. Or: how semi-formal, defeasible argumentation schemes creep into logic. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence (eds. Rahwan, I., & Simari, G.).
Colen, S., Cnossen, F. & Verheij, B. (2009). How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving? Icail 2009.
Verheij, B. (2008). About the Logical Relations between Cases and Rules. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference (eds. Francesconi, E., Sartor, G., & Tiscornia, D.), 21-32. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Hage, J.C., Verheij, B., & Fernhout, F. (2008). Vaardig met recht. Vaardigheden voor juristen. Derde druk (Skilful in the law. Skills for Lawyers. Third Edition). The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Schweers, M., & Verheij, B. (2007). Beyond boxes and arrows: argumentation support in terms of the knowledge structure of a legal topic. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference (eds. Lodder, A.R., & Mommers, L.), 109-118.
Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Verheij, B. (2007). A Labeling Approach to the Computation of Credulous Acceptance in Argumentation. IJCAI 2007, Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Hyderabad, India, January 6-12, 2007 (ed. Veloso, M.M.), 623-628.
http://www.ijcai.org/proceedings07.php.
Verheij, B. (2007). A Coffeehouse Conversation on the Van den Herik Test. Liber Amicorum ter gelegenheid van de 60e verjaardag van Prof.dr. H. Jaap van den Herik, 155-163.
Maastricht: Maastricht ICT Competence Center.
Verheij, B. (2007). Over de logische samenhang tussen casus en regels. ‘Alles afwegende….’ Bijdragen aan het Vijfde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie. Rotterdam 22 juni 2007 (eds. Feteris, E.T., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H.J., & Pontier, J.A.), 331-338.
Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.
Verheij, B. (2007). Commentaar bij E.T. Feteris: ‘Een rationele reconstructie van het wegen van belangen op basis van doelen’. ‘Alles afwegende….’ Bijdragen aan het Vijfde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie. Rotterdam 22 juni 2007 (eds. Feteris, E.T., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H.J., & Pontier, J.A.), 127-129.
Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.
Hage, J.C., Verheij, B., & Fernhout, F. (2007). Vaardig met recht. Vaardigheden voor juristen. Tweede druk (Skilful in the law. Skills for Lawyers. Second Edition). The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Verheij, B. (2007). Argumentation Support Software: Boxes-and-Arrows and Beyond. Law, Probability & Risk: 6, 187-208.
Hitchcock, D.L., & Verheij, B. (2006). Introduction. Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (eds. Hitchcock, D.L., & Verheij, B.), 1-23.
Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
van der Vaart, E., de Boer, B., Hankel, A., & Verheij, B. (2006). Agents adopting agriculture: Modeling the agricultural transition. From Animals to Animats 9, 9th International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, SAB 2006, Rome, Italy, September 25-29, 2006. Proceedings (eds. Nolfi, S., Baldassarre, G., Calabretta, R., Hallam, J.C.T., Marocco, D., Meyer, J.-A., Miglino, O., & Parisi, D.), 750-761.
Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Verheij, B. (2006). Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme. Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (eds. Hitchcock, D.L., & Verheij, B.), 181-202.
Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
Hitchcock, D.L., & Verheij, B. (eds.) (2006). Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (Argumentation Library, Volume 10). Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
Verheij, B. (2005). Virtual arguments. On the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
Hitchcock, D.L., & Verheij, B. (2005). The Toulmin model today: Introduction to special issue of Argumentation on contemporary work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s layout of arguments. Argumentation: 19 (3), 255-258.
Verheij, B. (2005). Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme. Argumentation: 19 (3), 347-371.
